Wednesday, September 28, 2011

SHAHEED BHAGT SINGH


Bhagat Singh 28 September 1907[9] – 23 March 1931[1][2]) was an Indian freedom fighter, considered to be one of the most influential revolutionaries of the Indian independence movement. He is often referred to as Shaheed Bhagat Singh (the word shaheed meaning "martyr").
Born to a Jat[10] Sikh family which had earlier been involved in revolutionary activities against the British Raj, Singh, as a teenager, became an atheist and had studied European revolutionary movements. He also became attracted to anarchism and marxistideologies.[11] He became involved in numerous revolutionary organizations. He quickly rose through the ranks of the Hindustan Republican Association (HRA) and became one of its leaders, and was influencial in changing its name to the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association (HSRA), which emphasises his socialist outlook.[12] Singh gained support when he underwent a 41-day[13] fast in jail, demanding equal rights for Indian and British political prisoners.[14] He was hanged for shooting a police officer in response to a policelathi charge leading to the demise of veteran freedom fighter Lala Lajpat Rai. His legacy prompted youths in India to begin fighting for Indian independence and socialism in India.[15]


Early life

Bhagat Singh's house as seen outsideFaisalabad in Pakistan
Bhagat Singh was born into a Sandhu Jatt[11] family to Sardar Kishan Singh Sandhu and Sardarni Vidyavati Kaur in a village in the Lyallpur district of Punjab in modern-dayPakistan.[16] Lyallpur is now know as Faisalabad. His ancestral village is the Khatkar Kalanvillage near Banga town in Nawanshahr District of Punjab.The District has recently been renamed as Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar. Singh's given name of Bhagat means "devotee", and he was nicknamed "Bhaganwala" by his grandmother, meaning "The lucky one".[17] He came from a patriotic Jatt Sikh family, some of whom had participated in movements supporting the independence of India and others who had served in Maharaja Ranjit Singh's army.[18] His grandfather, Arjun Singh, was a follower of Swami Dayananda Saraswati's Hindu reformist movement, Arya Samaj,[19] which would carry a heavy influence on Singh. His uncles, Ajit Singh and Swaran Singh, as well as his father were members of the Ghadar Party, led by Kartar Singh Sarabha Grewal and Har DayalAjit Singh was forced to flee toPersia because of pending cases against him while Swaran Singh died in 1910 at his home after releasing from Borstle Jail, Lahore.[20]
Unlike many Sikhs his age, Singh did not attend Khalsa High School in Lahore, because his grandfather did not approve of the school officials' loyalism to the British authorities.[21] Instead, his father enrolled him in Dayanand Anglo Vedic High School, an Arya Samajist school.[22] At age 13, Singh began to follow Mahatma Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement. At this point he had openly defied theBritish and had followed Gandhi's wishes by burning his government-school books and any British-imported clothing. Following Gandhi's withdrawal of the movement after the violent murders of policemen by villagers from Chauri ChauraUttar Pradesh, Singh, disgruntled with Gandhi's nonviolence action, joined the Young Revolutionary Movement and began advocating a violent movement against the British.[23]
In 1923, Bhagat famously won an essay competition set by the Punjab Hindi Sahitya Sammelan. This grabbed the attention of members of the Punjab Hindi Sahitya Sammelan including its General Secretary Professor Bhim Sen Vidyalankar. At this age, he quoted famous Punjabi literature and discussed the Problems of the Punjab. He read a lot of poetry and literature which was written by Punjabi writers and his favourite poet was Allama Iqbal from Sialkot.[24]
In his teenage years, Bhagat Singh started studying at the National College in Lahore,[25] but ran away from home to escape early marriage, and became a member of the organisation Naujawan Bharat Sabha ("Youth Society of India").[11] In the Naujawan Bharat Sabha, Singh and his fellow revolutionaries grew popular amongst the youth. He also joined the Hindustan Republican Associationthrough introduction by history teacher, Professor Vidyalankar,[26] which had prominent leaders like Ram Prasad Bismil,Chandrashekhar Azad and Ashfaqulla Khan.[27] It is believed that he went to Kanpur to attempt free Kakori train robbery prisoners from the jail, but returned to Lahore for unknown reasons.[28] On the day of Dasara in October 1926, a bomb was blasted in Lahore, and Bhagat Singh was arrested for his alleged involvement in this Dasara Bomb Case in 29 May 1927,[29] and was released on a bail of Rs.60,000 after about five weeks of his arrest.[30][31] He wrote for and edited Urdu and Punjabi newspapers published from Amritsar.[32]In September 1928, a meeting of various revolutionaries from across India was called at Delhi under the banner of the Kirti Kissan Party. Bhagat Singh was the secretary of the meet. His later revolutionary activities were carried out as a leader of this association.

Later revolutionary activities

Lala Lajpat Rai's death and the Saunders murder

A rare historical photograph of students and staff of National College, Lahore, which was started by Lala Lajpat Rai for education of students participating in the non-cooperation movement. Bhagat Singh can be seen standing fourth from the right.
The British government created a commission under Sir John Simon to report on the current political situation in India in 1928. The Indian political parties boycotted the commission because it did not include a single Indian as its member and it was met with protests all over the country. When the commission visited Lahore on 30 October 1928, Lala Lajpat Rai led the protest against Simon Commission in a silent non-violent march, but the police responded with violence.[33] Lala Lajpat Rai was beaten with lathis at the chest.[33] He later succumbed to his injuries.[33] Bhagat Singh, who was an eyewitness to this event, vowed to take revenge.[34] He joined with other revolutionaries, Shivaram RajguruSukhdev Thapar, Jai Gopal and Chandrashekhar Azad, in a plot to kill the Superintendent of police, J. A. Scott. Jai Gopal was supposed to identify the chief and signal for Singh to shoot. However, in a case of mistaken identity, Gopal signalled Singh on the appearance of John P. Saunders, an Assistant Superintendent of Police. J.P. Saunders in his early twenties, still a probationer, while leaving the District Police Headquarters at about 4:15 p.m. on December 17, 28 was mistaken as Scott and shot by Rajguru and Bhagat Singh. Head Constable Chanan Singh was also killed when he came to his help.

Dramatic escape[35]

After killing Saunders, they escaped through the D.A.V. College entrance, on the other side of the road. Head Constable Chanan Singh who chased them was fatally injured by Chandrashekhar Azad's covering fire. They then fled on bicycles to the prearranged places of safety. The police launched a massive search operation to nab the culprits and blocked all exits and entrances. The police sealed all roads from the city; the CID kept a watch at the railway stations and all young men leaving Lahore were carefully scrutinized. They kept themselves underground for the next two days.
Sukhdev called at Mrs Durga Devi Vohra after 10 p.m. on December 19, 1928. She agreed to help them out. It was settled that they would catch the train leaving Lahore for Howrah en route Bathinda the next morning at 6:10. That train was chosen because they could leave in the early hours before the arrival of CID picket. Bhagat Singh in Western dress carrying the sleeping infant, Durga Bhabi in her most impressive attire and Rajguru shuffling under luggage, left the house at about 5 a.m. long before the CID arrived. On reaching the station, Bhagat Singh keeping his facial profile reasonably covered on one side with a slightly raised collar of the overcoat and on the other by the sleeping infant, purchased two tickets, a joint second class Christmas return ticket and a third class one for the servant, forCawnpur. They walked side by side into the railway station with Rajguru carrying the luggage behind in a servile manner. Both men carried concealed loaded revolvers with them for facing any untoward incident, because police parties in uniform as well as in civil clothes were watching carefully all departures from Lahore. An impressively respectable young couple carrying a child, Western style dress and to top it all, a joint second class Christmas return ticket cast a spell over the police and they boarded the train without causing any suspicion. To avoid recognition, Bhagat Singh shaved his beard and cut his hair, a violation of the sacred tenets of Sikhism.
Breaking journey at Cawnpur they went to Lucknow, as the CID at Howrah kept a close watch on passengers coming directly from Lahore. At Lucknow Rajguru parted company and left for Varanasi. Bhagat Singh, Durga Bhabhi and the infant went to Howrah, and moved to Shushila Didi’s place. Durga Devi went back to Lahore a few days later.

Bomb in the assembly

In the face of actions by the revolutionaries, the British government enacted the Defence of India Act to give more power to the police.[36]The purpose of the Act was to combat revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh.[36] However, the Act was then passed under the ordinance that claimed that it was in the best interest of the public. In response to this act, the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association planned to explode a bomb in the Central Legislative Assembly where the ordinance was going to be passed. This idea was originated by Bhagat Singh, who was influenced by a similar bombing by a martyr anarchist Auguste Vaillant in the French Assembly.[37] It was decided that Bhagat Singh should go to Russia, while Batukeshwar Dutt should carry on the bombing with Sukhdev.[37] Sukhdev then forced Bhagat Singh to call for another meeting and here it was decided, against the initial agreement, that Batukeshwar Dutt and Bhagat Singh would carry on the bombing.[37] Bhagat Singh also disapproved that the two should be escorted after the bombing by the rest of the party.[37]
On 8 April 1929, Singh and Dutt threw a bomb onto the corridors of the assembly and shouted "Inquilab Zindabad!" ("Long Live the Revolution!").[38] This was followed by a shower of leaflets stating that it takes a loud voice to make the deaf hear.[39]
The bomb neither killed nor injured anyone; Singh and Dutt claimed that this was deliberate on their part, a claim substantiated both by British forensics investigators who found that the bomb was not powerful enough to cause injury, and by the fact that the bomb was thrown away from people.[40] Singh and Dutt gave themselves up for arrest after the bomb.[40] He and Dutt were sentenced to 'Transportation for Life' for the bombing on 12 June 1929.

Trial and execution

Front page of The Tribune announcing Bhagat Singh's execution.
The story of the Trial of Bhagat Singh is as much a story of revolution in India as the system of law and justice under the British rule. Bhagat Singh's trial is an important event in the Indian history because it defied the fundamental doctrine of criminal jurisprudence. The trial was held ex-parte in breach of the principles of natural justice according to which No man shall be condemned unless he is given a hearing.[41]
On April 8, 1929, Bhagat Singh and B.K. Dutt threw a bomb in the Central Legislative Assembly to make the deaf hear. As intended, nobody was hurt by the low intensity explosion as Bhagat Singh had aimed the bomb carefully, to land away from the seated members, on the floor. Bhagat Singh and B.K.Dutt let themselves be arrested, even when they could have escaped, to use their court appearances as a forum for revolutionary propaganda to advocate the revolutionaries’ point of view and, in the process, rekindle patriotic sentiments in the hearts of the people. Bhagat Singh surrendered his automatic pistol, the same one he had used to pump bullets into Saunder’s body, knowing fully well that the pistol would be the highest proof of his involvement in the Saunders’ case.[42]
On 15 April 1929, the 'Lahore Bomb Factory' was discovered by the Lahore police, and the other members of HSRA were arrested, out of which 7 turned informants, helping the police to connect Bhagat Singh in the murder of J. P. Saunders.[43] Bhagat Singh,Rajguru, and Sukhdev were charged with the murder. Bhagat Singh decided to use the court as a tool to publicise his cause for the independence of India.[44]
Bhagat Singh was charged with attempt to murder under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Asaf Ali, a member of the Congress Party was his lawyer. The Trial started on 7 May 1929. The Crown was represented by the public prosecutor Rai Bahadur Suryanarayan and the trial magistrate was a British Judge, P.B Pool. The prosecution’s star witness was Sergeant Terry who said that a pistol had been found on Bhagat Singh’s person when he was arrested in the Assembly. This was not factually correct because Bhagat Singh had himself surrendered the pistol while asking the police to arrest him. Even the eleven witnesses who said that they had seen the two throwing the bombs seemed to have been tutored. The entire incident had been so sudden that nobody could have anticipated it. The magistrate committed both of them to the Sessions Court of Judge Leonard Middleton.[45] Judge Middleton ruled that he had no doubt that the defendant’s acts were ‘deliberate’ and rejected the plea that the bombs were deliberately low-intensity bombs since the impact of the explosion had shattered the wood of one and a half inch thickness in the Assembly. The two were persuaded to file an appeal which was rejected and they were sentenced to transportation for life (fourteen years).
The police had gathered ‘substantial evidence’ against Bhagat Singh and he was charged with involvement in the killings of Saunders and Head Constable Chanan Singh. The authorities had collected nearly 600 witnesses to establish their charges, which included his colleagues, Jai Gopal and Hans Raj Vohra turning government approvers. Singh was re-arrested for the murder of Saunders and the life imprisonment sentence was kept in abeyance till the outcome of the murder trial.[46]
Bhagat Singh was sent to Mianwali Jail and B. Dutt to Borstal Jail in Lahore. They were put on the same train, though in different compartments, on 12 March 1930 but after requesting the officer on duty to allow them to sit together for some distance of the journey, Bhagat Singh conveyed to Dutt that he should go on a hunger strike on 15 June and that he would do the same in Mianwali Jail. On reaching Mianwali jail, Bhagat Singh found that European prisoners got better accomodation, food and daily use items compared to Indian prisoners.
While in jail, Bhagat Singh and other prisoners launched a hunger strike advocating for the rights of prisoners and those facing trial. The reason for the strike was that British murderers and thieves were treated better than Indian political prisoners, who, by law, were meant to be given better rights. The aims in their strike were to ensure a decent standard of food for political prisoners, the availability of books and a daily newspaper, as well as better clothing and the supply of toiletry necessities and other hygienic necessities. He also demanded that political prisoners should not be forced to do any labour or undignified work.[47]
As the fast progressed without any solution in sight, Jawaharlal Nehru met Bhagat Singh and the other protesters. He said, "I was very much pained to see the distress of the heroes. They have staked their lives in this struggle. They want that political prisoners should be treated as political prisoners. I am quite hopeful that their sacrifice would be crowned with success[46]".
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, one of the politicians present when the Central Legislative Assembly was bombed,[48] made no secret of his sympathies for the Lahore prisoners - commenting on the hunger strike he said, "The man who goes on hunger strike has a soul. He is moved by that soul, and he believes in the justice of his cause." And talking of Singh's actions, he said, "...however much you deplore them and however much you say they are misguided, it is the system, this damnable system of governance, which is resented by the people...".[49]
The Government tried several tricks to break the strike. They placed dishes of different types in the cells of test the resolve of the strikers. Water pitchers were filled with milk so that either the prisoners remained thirsty or broke their strike. But nobody faltered. The authorities attempted forced-feeding, but were resisted. One of the prisoners, Kasuri, swallowed red pepper and drank hot water to clog the feeding tube. The Governor came down from Shimla to meet the jail authorities. There was no breakthrough.
When the Government realized that this fast had riveted the attention of the people throughout the country, it decided to hurry up the trial, which came to known as the Lahore Conspiracy Case. This trial started in Borstal Jail, Lahore, on 10 July 1929. Rai Sahib Pandit Sri Kishen, a first class magistrate, was the judge for this trial. Bhagat Singh and twenty-seven others were charged with murder, conspiracy and wagering war against the King. The revolutionaries’ strategy was to boycott the proceedings. They showed no interest in the trial and adopted an attitude of total indifference. A handcuffed Bhagat Singh, still on hunger strike, had to be brought to the court in a stretcher and his weight had fallen by 14 pounds, from 133 to 119. By then, the condition of Jatindra Nath Das, who was lodged in the same jail and was also on a hunger strike, had deteriorated considerably. The jail committee recommended his unconditional release, but the government rejected the suggestion and offered to release him on bail. Jatin died on September 13, 1929. His fast lasted 63 days. After his death, the Viceroy informed London[46]:
Jatin Das of the Conspiracy Case, who was on hunger strike, died this afternoon at 1 p.m. Last night, five of the huunger strikers gave up their hunger strike. So there are only Bhagat Singh and Dutt who are on strike ...
The highest tributes were paid by almost every leader in the country. Mohammad Alam and Gopi Chand Bhargava resigned from the Punjab Legislative Council in protest. Motilal Nehru proposed the adjournment of the Central Assembly as a censure against the inhumanity of the Lahore prisoners. The censure motion was carried by 55 votes against 47.
The Jail Committee requested him to give up his hunger strike and finally it was his father who had his way, armed with a resolution from the Congress party urging them to give up their strike; and it was on the 116th day of their fast, on October 5, 1929 that Bhagat Singh and Dutt gave up their strike (surpassing the 97 day world record for hunger strikes which was set by an Irish revolutionary). During this hunger strike that lasted 116 days and ended with the British succumbing to his wishes, he gained much popularity among the common Indians. Before the strike his popularity was limited mainly to the Punjab region.[50]
Bhagat Singh started refocusing on his trial. The crown was represented by the government advocate C.H.Carden-Noad and was assisted by Kalandar Ali Khan, Gopal Lal, and Bakshi Dina Nath who was the prosecuting inspector. The accused were defended by 8 different lawyers. When Jai Gopal turned approver, Verma, the youngest of the accused, hurled a slipper at him. The case was ordered to be carried out without members of the HSRA present at the hearing. This created an uproar amongst Singh's supporters as he could no longer publicise his views.
The case proceeded at a snail's pace. On 1 May 1930, by declaring an emergency, the Viceroy, Lord Irwin, promulgated an Ordinance to set up a tribunal to try this case. This Special Tribunal was given the power to proceed with the case in the absence of the accused and accept death of the persons giving evidence as a benefit to the defence. The Ordinance, Lahore Conspiracy Case Ordinance No.3 of 1930, was to put an end to the proceedings pending in the magistrate’s court. The case was transferred from the court of Rai Sahib Pandit Sri Kishan to a Special Tribunal of three high court judges without any right to appeal, except to the Privy Council.
The case opened on 5 May 1930 in the stately Poonch House. Rajguru challenged the very constitution of the tribunal and said that it was illegal ultra vires. According to him, the Viceroy did not have the power to cut short the normal legal procedure. The Government of India Act, 1915, authorized the Viceroy to promulgate an Ordinance to set up a tribunal but only when the situation demanded whereas now there was no breakdown in the law and order situation. The tribunal however, ruled that the petition was ‘premature’. Carden-Noad, the government advocate elaborated on the charges which included dacoities, robbing money from banks and the collection of arms and ammunition. The evidence of G.T. Hamilton Harding, senior superintendent of police, took the court by surprise, as he said that he had filed the FIR against the accused under the instructions of the chief secretary to the government of Punjab and he did not know the facts of the case. There were five approvers in total out of which Jai Gopal, Hans Raj Vohra and P.N.Ghosh had been associated with the HRSA for a long time. It was on their stories that the prosecution relied. The tribunal depended on Section 9 (1) of the Ordinance and on 10 July 1930, issued an order, and copies of the framed charges were served on the fifteen accused in jail, together with copies of an order intimating them that their pleas would be taken on the charges the following day. This trial was a long and protracted one, beginning on 5 May 1930, and ending on 10 September 1930. The tribunal framed charges against fifteen out of the eighteen accused. The case against B.K.Dutt was withdrawn as he had already been sentenced to transportation for life in the Assembly Bomb Case.
On 7 October 1930, about three weeks before the expiry of its term, the tribunal delivered its judgement, sentencing Bhagat Singh,Sukhdev and Rajguru to death by hanging.[51][52][53] Others were sentenced to transportation for life and rigorous imprisonment. This judgement was a 300-page one which went into the details of the evidence and said that Bhagat Singh’s participation in the Saunders’ murder was the most serious and important fact proved against him and it was fully established by evidence. The warrants for the three were marked with a black border.
The undertrials of the Chittagong Armoury Raid Case sent an appeal to Gandhiji to intervene. A defence committee was constituted in Punjab to file an appeal to the Privy Council against the sentence. Bhagat Singh did not favour the appeal but his only satisfaction was that the appeal would draw the attention of people in England to the existence of the HSRA. In the case of Bhagat Singh v. The King Emperor, the points raised by the appellant was that the ordinance promulgated to constitute a special tribunal for the trial was invalid. The government argued that Section 72 of the Government of India Act, 1915 gave the governor-general unlimited powers to set up a tribunal. Judge Viscount Dunedin who read the judgment dismissed the appeal. Thus from the lower court to the tribunal to the Privy Council, it was a preordained judgement in flagrant violation of all tenets of natural justice and a fair and free trial.[42]
An abortive plan had been made to rescue Bhagat Singh and fellow inmates of HSRA from the jail, for the purpose of which Bhagwati Charan Vohra made bombs, but died making them as they exploded accidentally.[54]
Bhagat Singh also maintained the use of a diary, in which he eventually wrote 404 pages. In this diary he made numerous notes relating to the quotations and popular sayings of various people whose views he supported. Prominent in his diary were the views of Karl Marxand Friedrich Engels.[55] The comments in his diary led to an understanding of the philosophical thinking of Bhagat Singh[56] While in the condemned cell, he also wrote a pamphlet entitled "Why I am an atheist", as he was being accused of vanity by not accepting God in the face of death.[57] It is also said that he signed a mercy petition through a comrade Bijoy Kumar Sinha on 8 March 1931.[58]
Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev were sentenced to death in the Lahore conspiracy case and ordered to be hanged on March 24, 1931. On 23 March 1931 at 7:30 pm, Bhagat Singh was hanged in Lahore Jail with his fellow comrades Rajguru and Sukhdev. His supporters, who had been protesting against the hanging, immediately declared him as a shaheed or martyr.[59] According to the Superintendent of Police at the time, V.N. Smith, the hanging was advanced by a day:
Normally execution took place at 8 am, but it was decided to act at once before the public could become aware of what had happened...At about 7 pm shouts of Inquilab Zindabad were heard from inside the jail. This was interpreted, correctly, as a signal that the final curtain was about to drop.[60]
The Jail authorities broke the rear wall of the Jail and secretly cremated the three martyrs under cover of darkness on the banks of Sutlej, about 10 km from Ferozepore.[61][62]

Ideals and opinions

Bhagat Singh was attracted to anarchism and communism.[11] Both communism and western anarchism had influence on him. He read the teachings of MarxEngelsLeninTrotsky and Bakunin.[63][64] Bhagat Singh did not believe in Gandhian philosophy and felt that Gandhian politics would replace one set of exploiters with another.[65] Singh was an atheist and promoted the concept of atheism by writing a pamphlet titled Why I am an Atheist.[66] Bhagat Singh was also an admirer of the writings of Irish revolutionary Terence MacSwiney.[67] When Bhagat Singh's father petitioned the British government to pardon his son, Bhagat Singh quoted Terence MacSwiney and said ""I am confident that my death will do more to smash the British Empire than my release" and told his father to withdraw the petition.[68]
Some of his writings like "Blood Sprinkled on the Day of Holi Babbar Akalis on the Crucifix" were influenced by the struggle of Dharam Singh Hayatpur.[69]

Anarchism

From May to September, 1928, Bhagat Singh serially published several articles on anarchism in Punjabi periodical Kirti.[11] He expressed concern over misunderstanding of the concept of anarchism among the public. Singh tried to eradicate the misconception among people about anarchism. He wrote, "The people are scared of the word anarchism. The word anarchism has been abused so much that even in India revolutionaries have been called anarchist to make them unpopular." As anarchism means absence of ruler and abolition of state, not absence of order, Singh explained, "I think in India the idea of universal brotherhood, the Sanskrit sentencevasudhaiva kutumbakam etc., has the same meaning." He wrote about the growth of anarchism,"the first man to explicitly propagate the theory of Anarchism was Proudhon and that is why he is called the founder of Anarchism. After him a Russian, Bakunin, worked hard to spread the doctrine. He was followed by Prince Kropotkin etc."[11]
Singh explained anarchism in the article:
The ultimate goal of Anarchism is complete independence, according to which no one will be obsessed with God or religion, nor will anybody be crazy for money or other worldly desires. There will be no chains on the body or control by the state. This means that they want to eliminate: the Church, God and Religion; the state; Private property.[11]

Marxism

Bhagat Singh was also influenced by Marxism. He unambiguously stated in his last testament that the ideal for him and his comrades was "the social reconstruction on Marxist basis".[70] Indian historian K. N. Panikkar described Singh as one of the early Marxists in India.[65] From 1926, Bhagat Singh studied the history of the revolutionary movement in India and abroad. In his prison notebooks, Singh used quotations from Vladmir Lenin (on imperialism being the highest stage of capitalism) and Trotsky on revolution.[11] In written documents, when asked what was his last wish, he replied that he was studying the life of Lenin and he wanted to finish it before his death.[71]

Atheism

Singh began to question religious ideologies after witnessing the Hindu-Muslim riots that broke out after Gandhi disbanded the Non-Cooperation Movement.[72] He did not understand how members of these two groups, initially united in fighting against the British, could be at each others' throats because of their religious differences. At this point, Singh dropped his religious beliefs, since he believed religion hindered the revolutionaries' struggle for independence, and began studying the works of Bakunin, Lenin, Trotsky — all atheist revolutionaries. He also took an interest in Niralamba Swami's[73] book Common Sense, which advocated a form of "mystic atheism".[74]
While in a condemned cell in 1931, he wrote a pamphlet entitled Why I am an Atheist in which he discusses and advocates the philosophy of atheism. This pamphlet was a result of some criticism by fellow revolutionaries on his failure to acknowledge religion and God while in a condemned cell, the accusation of vanity was also dealt with in this pamphlet. He supported his own beliefs and claimed that he used to be a firm believer in The Almighty, but could not bring himself to believe the myths and beliefs that others held close to their hearts. In this pamphlet, he acknowledged the fact that religion made death easier, but also said that unproved philosophy is a sign of human weakness.[75] In this context he has said:
As regard the origin of God, my thought is that man created God in his imagination when he realized his weaknesses, limitations and shortcomings. In this way he got the courage to face all the trying circumstances and to meet all dangers that might occur in his life and also to restrain his outbursts in prosperity and affluence. God, with his whimsical laws and parental generosity was painted with variegated colours of imagination. He was used as a deterrent factor when his fury and his laws were repeatedly propagated so that man might not become a danger to society. He was the cry of the distressed soul for he was believed to stand as father and mother, sister and brother, brother and friend when in time of distress a man was left alone and helpless. He was Almighty and could do anything. The idea of God is helpful to a man in distress.
— Bhagat Singh, Why I am an Atheist

Death

Bhagat Singh was known for his appreciation of martyrdom. His mentor as a young boy was Kartar Singh Sarabha.[76] Singh is himself considered a martyr for acting to avenge the death of Lala Lajpat Rai. In the leaflet he threw in the Central Assembly on 9 April 1929, he stated that It is easy to kill individuals but you cannot kill the ideas. Great empires crumbled while the ideas survived.[77] After engaging in studies on the Russian Revolution, he wanted to die so that his death would inspire the youth of India which in turn will unite them to fight the British Empire.
While in prison, Bhagat Singh and two others had written a letter to the Viceroy asking him to treat them as prisoners of war and hence to execute them by firing squad and not by hangingPrannath Mehta, Bhagat Singh's friend, visited him in the jail on 20 March, four days before his execution, with a draft letter for clemency, but he declined to sign it.[78]

Controversy

Bhagat Singh's life is the subject of controversy.

Last wish

Many believe that Bhai Randhir Singh, a revolutionary of 1st Lahore Conspiracy Case and Gadhar, prison inmate and a known figure in Sikh circles, met with Bhagat Singh in condemned cells in Lahore Central Jail on 4 October 1930, when Randhir Singh was released from the jail, as mentioned in his book "Jail Chithiyan" by Randhir Singh himself.[79][80][81] Bhagat was condemned on 7 October 1930 contradicting his presence in condemned cells on the 4 October.[82] According to Randhir Singh, Bhagat mentioned to him, that he (Bhagat Singh) had shaven "hair and beard under pressing circumstances" and that "It was for the service of the country" that his companions "compelled him to give up the Sikh appearance" adding to it that he was "ashamed".[83][84] He had expressed, as his last wish before being hanged, the desire to get "amrit" from Randhir Singh and to once again adorn the 5 k's.[84][85] However, his last wish, of getting "amrit" was not granted by the British.[85] Some scholars are skeptic about this meeting as, Randhir Singh being the only source of information about sudden change in Bhagat Singh's point of view towards religion casts doubts, as Bhagat Singh had been a strong critic of religion."[86][87][88] And Bhagat Singh had also mentioned towards the end of his article 'Why I am an Atheist':
Let us see how steadfast I am. One of my friends asked me to pray. When informed of my atheism, he said, “When your last days come, you will begin to believe.” I said, “No, dear sir, Never shall it happen. I consider it to be an act of degradation and demoralisation. For such petty selfish motives, I shall never pray.” Reader and friends, is it vanity? If it is, I stand for it.
— Bhagat Singh, Why I am an Atheist

Conspiracy theories

Many conspiracy theories exist regarding Singh, especially the events surrounding his death:

Mahatma Gandhi

One of the most popular ones is that Mahatma Gandhi had an opportunity to stop Singh's execution but did not.[89] A variation of this theory is that Gandhi actively conspired with the British to have Singh executed.[89] Gandhi's supporters[89] say that Gandhi did not have enough influence with the British to stop the execution, much less arrange it. Furthermore, Gandhi's supporters assert that Singh's role in the independence movement was no threat to Gandhi's role as its leader, and so Gandhi would have no reason to want him dead.
Gandhi, during his lifetime, always maintained that he was a great admirer of Singh's patriotism. He also said that he was opposed to Singh's execution (and, for that matter, capital punishment in general) and proclaimed that he had no power to stop it. On Singh's execution, Gandhi said, "The government certainly had the right to hang these men. However, there are some rights which do credit to those who possess them only if they are enjoyed in name only."[90] Gandhi also once said, on capital punishment, "I cannot in all conscience agree to anyone being sent to the gallows. God alone can take life because He alone gives it."
Gandhi had managed to have 90,000 political prisoners[78] who were not members of his Satyagraha movement released under theGandhi-Irwin Pact.[78] According to a report in the Indian magazine Frontline, he did plead several times for the commutation of the death sentence of Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev, including a personal visit on 19 March 1931, and in a letter to the Viceroy on the day of their execution, pleading fervently for commutation, not knowing that the letter would be too late.[78]
Lord Irwin, the Viceroy, later said:
As I listened to Mr. Gandhi putting the case for commutation before me, I reflected first on what significance it surely was that the apostle of non-violence should so earnestly be pleading the cause of the devotees of a creed so fundamentally opposed to his own, but I should regard it as wholly wrong to allow my judgment to be influenced by purely political considerations. I could not imagine a case in which under the law, penalty had been more directly deserved.[78]
However, Gandhi did appreciate Bhagat's patriotism and how he had overcome the fear of death, but did not support the violence involved.[91]

Saunders family

On 28 October 2005, a book entitled Some Hidden Facts: Martyrdom of Shaheed Bhagat Singh—Secrets unfurled by an Intelligence Bureau Agent of British-India [sic] by K.S. Kooner and G.S. Sindhra was released. The book asserts that Singh, Rajguru, and Sukhdev were deliberately hanged in such a manner as to leave all three in a semi-conscious state, so that all three could later be taken outside the prison and shot dead by the Saunders family. The book says that this was a prison operation codenamed "Operation Trojan Horse." Scholars are sceptical of the book's claims.[92]

Legacy

Indian independence movement

Bhagat Singh's death had the effect that he desired and he inspired thousands of youths to assist the remainder of the Indian independence movement. After his hanging, youths in regions around Northern India rioted in protest against the British Raj and Gandhi.[93]

Memorials and Museums

  • National Martyrs Memorial
The National Martyrs MemorialHussainiwala, built in memory of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru
Bhagat Singh was cremated at Hussainiwala on banks of Sutlej river. The National Martyrs Memorial Hussainiwala, built in 1968,[94] depicts an irrepressible revolutionary spirit of the three National Martyrs, Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev. The memorial is located just one km from the India-Pakistan border on the Indian side and has memorials of Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev. After Partition, the cremation spot went to Pakistan but on January 17, 1961, this martyr's land was received when India gave 12 villages near the Sulemanki Headworks (Fazilka) to Pakistan.[95] But the irony of the fate is that during 1971 Indo-Pak war, the statues of these very martyrs were removed and taken away by Pakistan army and have not been returned till today.[61][96] B.K. Dutt was also cremated here on 19 July 1965 and in accordance with his last wishes. Bhagat Singh's mother, Punjab Mata Vidyawati, was also cremated here in accordance with her last wish.
This memorial was damaged by the withdrawing Pakistani troops in 1972. They also removed the busts of the three national heroes during 1971 war when the area was captured by Pakistani troops. The memorial came up once again in 1973 due to the efforts of the then Punjab Chief Minister, Giani Zail Singh.[62]
Every year, on the 23rd of March, the Shaheedi Mela is observed at this National Martyrs Memorial at Hussainiwala, in which thousands of people pay their homage.[97] The day is also observed across the state of Punjab.
  • Bhagat Singh Museum & Bhagat Singh Memorial
A museum by the name "Shaheed-e-azam Sardar Bhagat Singh Museum" has been built at his maternal village, Khatkar Kalan, where sand and newspaper stained with his blood and his half burnt bones are preserved.[98]
The Bhagat Singh Memorial was built in 2009 in his hometown of Khatkar Kalan at a cost of Rs.168 million.[99]

Modern day

Statues of Bhagat Singh, Rajguru andSukhdev
Singh's contribution to Indian society[100] and, in particular, the future of socialism in India. To celebrate the centenary of his birth, a group of intellectuals have set up an institution to commemorate Singh and his ideals.[101]
Several popular Bollywood films have been made capturing the life and times of Bhagat Singh.[102][103] Possibly the first is Shaheed-e-Azad Bhagat Singh (1954),[104] followed byShaheed Bhagat Singh (1963),[105] starring Shammi Kapoor as Singh. Two years later, Manoj Kumar portrayed Bhagat Singh in an immensely popular and landmark film, Shaheed. Two major films about Singh were released in 2002, The Legend of Bhagat Singh and 23rd March 1931: ShaheedThe Legend of Bhagat Singh is Rajkumar Santoshi's adaptation, in which Ajay Devgan played Singh and Amrita Rao was featured in a brief role. 23rd March 1931: Shaheedwas directed by Guddu Dhanoa and starred Bobby Deol as Singh, with Sunny Deol andAishwarya Rai in supporting roles. Another major film Shaheed-E-Azam, starring Sonu Sood, Maanav Vij, Rajinder Gupta, and Sadhana Singh, and directed by Sukumar Nair, also was produced by Iqbal Dhillon under the banner Surjit Movies.[106]
Movies on Bhagat Singh
The 2006 film Rang De Basanti is a film drawing parallels between revolutionaries of Bhagat Singh's era and modern Indian youth. It covers a lot of Bhagat Singh's role in the Indian freedom struggle. The movie revolves around a group of college students and how they each play the roles of Bhagat's friends and family.
The patriotic Urdu and Hindi songs, Sarfaroshi ki Tamanna (translated as "the desire to sacrifice") and Mera Rang De Basanti Chola("my light-yellow-coloured cloak"; Basanti referring to the light-yellow color of the Mustard flower grown in the Punjab and also one of the two main colours of the Sikh religion as per the Sikh rehat meryada (code of conduct of the Sikh Saint-Soldier)), while created by Ram Prasad Bismil, are largely associated to Bhagat Singh's martyrdom and have been used in a number of Bhagat Singh-related films.[103]
In September 2007 the Governor of Punjab province, Khalid Maqbool, announced that a memorial to Bhagat Singh will be displayed atLahore Museum, according to the governor “Singh was the first martyr of the subcontinent and his example was followed by many youth of the time."[107][108] In 2008, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML) and Act Now for Harmony and Democracy (ANHAD), a non-profit organisation, co-produced 40 documentary on Bhagat Singh, titled, Inqilab directed by Gauhar Raza.[109][110]

Criticism

Bhagat Singh was criticised both by his contemporaries and by people after his death because of his violent and revolutionary stance towards the British and his strong opposition to the pacifist stance taken by the Indian National Congress and particularly Mahatma Gandhi.[111] The methods he used to make his point—shooting Saunders and throwing non-lethal bombs—were quite different fromGandhi's non-violent methodology.[111]

Quotations

  • "The aim of life is no more to control the mind, but to develop it harmoniously; not to achieve salvation here after, but to make he best use of it here below; and not to realise truth, beauty and good only in contemplation, but also in the actual experience of daily life; social progress depends not upon the ennoblement of the few but on the enrichment of democracy; universal brotherhood can be achieved only when there is an equality of opportunity - of opportunity in the social, political and individual life." — from Bhagat Singh's prison diary, p. 124
  • "Inquilab Zindabad" (Long live the revolution)[112]

THE KOMAGATA MARU


The Komagata Maru (also spelled Kamagata) was a Japanese steam liner, chartered in 1914 by Gurdit Singh, an affluent Sikh businessman, to carry 376 Indians, all Punjabis to Canada. The Ship embarked from Hong Kong, stopping in Shanghai, China; Yokohama, Japan; Vancouver, British Columbia before arriving in Canada.
S.S. Komogata Maru July 1914; passengers aboard ship and three observers on wharf.
During the period before 1920's the whole of North America has a policy of discrimination against coloured races which was thinly disguised to appear as something else. The dominate white governments of USA and Canada were determined not to allow the flow of Asians, whether so called 'yellow', 'brown' or 'black' immigrants.
The 1900 census reported only 2050 people from India living in Canada and the USA.
The majority of these were Punjabis men who had settled in Canada in the hope of finding work to improve their economic situation, many had left wives and children at home and as many Asians continue to do today, hoped to send money home to their extended families in Punjab. On arrival in Canada they encountered discrimination and were not welcomed by the white Canadians people who saw their employers all to willing to exploit hard working men who were willing to work for less money, they wanted this 'invasion' to stop. British Columbian politicians were soon pressured into passing stringent laws discouraging the immigration of Indians to Canada.
Indians coming across the pacific ocean, were required to have at least $200 on their person to enter British Columbia, this at a time when the average Indian worker earned only about ten cents a day. Additionally they had to have come by non stop passage from India. Few ships, if any, could carry enough coal, or wood at the time to make this possible. The Canadian government was also pressuring steamship companies to stop selling tickets to Indians.
In 1907 a bill was passed denying all Indians the right to vote that also restricted other rights they had previously enjoyed. All this was done to stop what was referred to as the "brown Invasion."
Kgm.jpg
Part of a series on
Komagata Maru





Komagata Maru arrives at Vancouver

So when the the Komagata Maru docked at Vancouver, the passengers were not allowed to land in Canada. Eventually, the ship was forced to return to India. The passengers consisting of 340 Sikhs, 24 Muslims, and 12 Hindus, who were all were British subjects had to suffer the hardship of many weeks sailing back. This was the most notorious "incident" in the history of Canada's attempt to limit British Citizens of Indian decent from entering Canada.
Gurdit Singh, from Sarhali, Amritsar, was a well-to-do businessman in Singapore who was aware of the problems that Punjabis were having in getting to Canada due to exclusion laws. He initially wanted to circumvent these laws by hiring a boat to sail from Calcutta to Vancouver. His aim was to help his compatriots whose journeys to Canada had been blocked.

Challenging the continuous journey regulation

In chartering the Komagata Maru, Gurdit Singh's goal was to challenge the continuous journey regulation and open the door for immigration from British India to Canada.
Hong Kong became the point of departure. The ship was scheduled to leave in March, but Singh was arrested for selling tickets for an illegal voyage. He was later released on bail and given permission by the Governor of Hong Kong to set sail, and the ship left Hong Kong on April 4 with 165 passengers. More passengers joined at Shanghai (April 8), and the ship arrived at Yokohama on April 14. It departed from Yokohama on May 3 with its complement of 376 passengers, and arrived in Burrard Inlet, near Vancouver, on May 23. "This ship belongs to the whole of India, this is a symbol of the honour of India and if this was detained, there would be mutiny in the armies" a passenger told a British officer. The Indian Nationalist revolutionaries Bhagwan Singh, Barkatullah and Balwant Singh joined the ship en route. Balwant Singh was head priest of the Gurdwara in Vancouver and had been one of three delegates sent to London and India to represent the case of Indians in Canada. Ghadarite literature was disseminated on board and political meetings took place on board.
MeninboatKamagatamaru.jpg

Arrival in Vancouver

When the Komagata Maru arrived in Canadian waters, it was not allowed to dock. The Conservative Premier of British Columbia, Richard McBride, gave a categorical statement that the passengers would not be allowed to disembark.
Meanwhile a "Shore Committee" had been formed with Hussain Rahim and Sohan Lal Pathak involved. Protest meetings were held in Canada and the USA. At one, held in Dominion Hall, Vancouver, it was resolved that if the passengers were not allowed off, Indo-Canadians should follow them back to India to start a rebellion (or Ghadar). The shore Committee raised $22,000 dollars as an instalment on chartering the ship. They also launched a test case legal battle in the name of Munshi Singh, one of the passengers. On July 7, the full bench of the Supreme Court gave a unanimous judgement that under new Orders-In-Council, it had no authority to interfere with the decisions of the Department of Immigration and Colonization. The Japanese Captain was relieved of duty by the angry passengers, but the Canadian government ordered the harbour tug, Sea Lion to push the ship out on its homeward journey. On July 19, the angry passengers mounted an attack. Next day the Vancouver newspaper The Sun reported: "Howling masses of Hindus showered policemen with lumps of coal and bricks... it was like standing underneath a coal chute".
The government also mobilised the HMCS Rainbow, a former Royal Navy ship standing idle in Esquimalt. Under the command of Commander Hose, with troops from the Irish Fusiliers, 72nd Highlanders, and the 6th DCOR regiments. In the end, only 24 passengers were admitted to Canada, since the ship had violated the exclusion laws, the passengers did not have the required funds, and they had not sailed directly from India, another requirement to make entry more difficult. The ship was turned around and forced to sail back to Asia, departing on July 23.

Return to India

The Komagata Maru arrived in Calcutta, India on September 26. Upon entry into the harbour, the ship was forced to stop by a British gunboat, and the passengers were placed under guard. The ship was then diverted approximately 17 miles to Budge Budge, where the British intended to put them on a train bound for Punjab. The passengers wanted to stay in Calcutta, and marched on the city, but were forced to return to Budge Budge and reboard the ship. The passengers protested, some refusing to re-board, and the police opened fire, killing 20 and wounding nine others. This incident became known as the Budge Budge Riot.
Gurdit Singh managed to escape and lived in hiding till 1922. He was urged by Gandhi to give himself up as a true patriot. He was imprisoned for five years.

Memorials and depictions

  • In 1951, the government of the new Republic of India erected its first monument at Budge Budge to commemorate the massacre there.
  • A plaque commemorating the 75th anniversary of the departure of the Komagata Maru was placed in the Sikh gurdwara (temple) in Vancouver on July 23, 1989.
  • A plaque commemorating the 80th anniversary of the arrival of the Komagata Maru was placed in the Vancouver harbour in 1994.
  • In 2004, Ali Kazimi's feature documentary Continuous Journey was released, This is the first in-depth film to examine the events surrounding the turning away of the Komagata Maru. The primary source research done for the film led to the remarkable discovery of rare film footage of the ship in Vancouver harbour. Eight years in the making Continuous Journey has won over ten awards, including the Most Innovative Canadian Documentary at DOXA, Vancouver 2005, and most recently, Golden Conch at the Mumbai International Film Festival, 2006.

Immigration controls in Canada, British Citizens of Indian decent


When Canada started making provisions to block immigration from India, it was warned by London to be cautious in its approach, and to be aware that its actions might inflame nationalist fervour in India. With this in mind, Canadian immigration authorities devised an ingenious plan to indirectly halt Indian immigration to the country. To be admitted to Canada, immigrants had to come by "continuous journey" from their country of birth and enter with at least $200 cash on their persons. The continuous journey regulation did not mention race or nationality and on the surface seemed fair and applicable to all immigrants. It was, however, an open secret that the regulation was to apply only to people from British India. Canadian Pacific did run a very lucrative shipping line between Vancouver and Calcutta. However, the Canadian government forced the company to stop this service. It was now impossible to come via continuous journey to Canada.
During the first two decades of the 20th century, Canada had recently passed several bills limiting the civil rights of Indians, including the right to vote, to hold public office, to serve on juries, or practice as pharmacists, lawyers, and accountants. However, because India, like Canada, was part of the British Empire, Canadian authorities did not pass exclusion laws explicitly targeting those of Indian origin. The Imperial authorities in London had noted Indian resentment when the White Australia policy was put in place in 1905; this policy was in turn adopted by New Zealand.
This was one of many hidden measures that Canada undertook to enforce a hidden "White Canada" policy. To put these measures in context, restrictions on Asian immigration were being enacted at a time when Canada was accepting massive numbers of European immigrants (over 400,000 in 1913 alone - a figure that remains unsurpassed to this day).

Immigration controls USA, Asian and some Europeans

  • Chinese Exclusion Act of the 1880s - kept any Chinese from immigrating to the United States until it was repealed in 1943, after which a strict quota of 103 Chinese were allowed to enter the USA each year.
  • 1907 Under an informal "Gentlemen's Agreement," the United States agrees not to restrict Japanese immigration in exchange for Japan's promise to voluntarily restrict Japanese emigration to the United States by not issuing passports to Japanese laborers. In return, the US promises to crack down on discrimination against Japanese-Americans, most of whom live in California.
  • 1913 California's Alien Land Law prohibits "aliens ineligible for citizenship" (Chinese and Japanese) from owning property in the state, providing a model for similar anti-Asian laws in other states.
  • 1917 Congress enacts a literacy requirement for immigrants by overriding President Woodrow Wilson's veto. The law requires immigrants to be able to read 40 words in some language and bans immigration from Asia, except for Japan and the Philippines.
  • 1917 The Immigration Act of 1917 restricts immigration from Asia by creating an "Asiatic Barred Zone."
  • 1921 The Emergency Quota Act restricts immigration from a given country to 3% of the number of people from that country living in the US in 1910.
  • 1922 The Cable Act partially repeals the Expatriation Act, but declares that an American woman who marries an Asian still loses her citizenship.
  • 1923 In the landmark case of United States vs. Bhaghat Singh Thind, the Supreme Court rules that Indians from the Asian subcontinent cannot become US citizens.
  • 1924 The Immigration Act of 1924 limits annual European immigration to 2% of the number of people from that country living in the United States in 1890. The Act greatly reduces immigration from Southern and Eastern European nationalities that had only small populations in the US in 1890.
  • 1924 The Oriental Exclusion Act prohibits most immigration from Asia, including foreign-born wives and the children of American citizens of Chinese ancestry.

‘Teaching students about Ranjeet or Bhagat Singh would not harm Pakistan’

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Rare Indian artefacts are sold in UK auction



Kashmir manuscriptThe manuscript is said to chronicle the 'golden years' of Sikh rule in Kashmir
Key historical documents from India, including an illustrated history of Kashmir, have been sold in the UK.
The Kashmir manuscript contains nine paintings, including that of the famous Maharajah Ranjit Singh, and sold for £11,700 ($19,000) at auction.
Other items included original paintings, miniatures on ivory, historical documents and statues.
A portrait of Maharajah Rajinder Singh of Patalia - an honorary general in the British army - was also for sale.
'Important collections'
But arguably the most eagerly awaited part of Thursday's sale was the Kashmir manuscript.

Miniature on ivory of Maharajah Duleep Singh
                          This miniature of Maharajah Duleep Singh is expected to sell for about $1,600
                                                   
"Kashmir was an important stronghold for the Sikh Kingdom - it was annexed in 1819 by Ranjit Singh ending 400 years of Muslim rule," explained Richard Westwood-Brookes, a spokesman for Mullock's auctioneers.
"Kashmir flourished under Sikh rule and became the second highest revenue earner for the Sikh empire.
"The manuscript contains nine paintings - one being a court scene of Ranjit Singh in discussion with Gulab Singh. In fact it probable that this manuscript was commissioned by Ranjit Singh himself," he said.
The portrait of Maharajah Rajinder Singh of Patalia - famous for marrying 365 wives and being the first man in India to own an aircraft - was expected to sell for more than £9,800 ($16,000) but did not attract a buyer.
Mr Westwood-Brookes said that was probably because of its large size.
However a rare photograph of the maharajah did sell for around £550 ($900).
Also under the hammer was an antique reproduction of the British imperial state crown, complete with a replica of the famous Koh-i-Noor diamond. Selling alongside it was a letter dated 1865 which describes how the diamond was surrendered to Queen Victoria by the Maharajah, Duleep Singh.
"This was without doubt one of the most important collections of this type of material to come on the market in the past few years," said Mr Westwood-Brookes.
The auction was held in Ludlow, in the English county of Shropshire.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

General Hari Singh Nalwa


Gen. Hari Singh Nalwa


Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa was the great Commander-in-chief of the Sikh Army whose courage and strength are unparalleled in Sikh History. The indelible mark left by this son of Punjab in a short period of time during Maharaj Ranjeet Singh's reign will always remain a golden chapter in history. His administration and foresight were just a few of his qualities, which were responsible for his rise to number one in the Darbar of the Maharaja, and being promoted to serve as a governor of Kashmir and the volatile Peshawar. He was the only individual whose name was minted on the currency of Punjab. His name spelt terror into the hearts of the Afghans and the Afghan mothers used to silence their crying children by saying, "(quiet child), Khamosh bash- Haria raghle ( Haria has come)!" Sardar Hari Singh was born in 1791 CE in Gujranwala (now in Pakistan) to Mata Dharam Kaur and father Sardar Gurdial Singh of the Uppal Khattri clan. S. Gurdial Singh was a commandant in the 'Shukerchakia Missal'. Hari Singh was only seven when his father died and it was in 1805 CE that he came under the attention of Maharaja Ranjeet Singh. in an open field event, which the Maharaja, used to organize. At an open field event, which the Maharaja used to regularly organize, Hari Singh showed his excellence in the events of horse riding, sword fighting, spear throwing and warfare etc., which completely astounded and pleased the Maharaja and immediately he invited Hari Singh to join his army.
Killing a lion
He was only with the Maharaja for a few months when one day he was asked to accompany the Maharaja for a hunt. As they entered the forest, suddenly a man eating lion jumped on him and threw him on the ground. Hari Singh was completely caught unaware and did not even have the opportunity to draw his sword. But he got hold of the jaw of the lion and with great force flung the lion away, and withdrawing his sword, with one blow severed the lion's head. The Maharaja and the other courtiers were extraordinarily amazed at this feat. From that day onwards Hari Singh was given the appellation of "Nalwa" by the Maharaja, who acknowledged that Hari Singh had killed the lion similar to the way King Nall used to hunt (King Nall was a very brave king and was known for his audacity to kill lions and other dangerous animals with his bare hands, and hence the Maharaja adorned Hari Singh with that title i.e. "Nall-wa"- 'like Nall' )
Baron Hugel, a European traveller, writes in his book, "Travels in Kashmir & the Punjab": - " I surprised him by knowledge whence he had gained the appellation of Nalwa, and of his having cloven the head of a tiger, who had already seized him as its prey. He told the Diwan to bring some drawings and gave me his portrait, in the act of killing the beast."The very next day the Maharaja appointed Hari Singh as a captain of a regiment called the "Sher-dil Regiment". This was the beginning of the great exploits of the highest esteemed person in the Maharaja Court - Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa. His first assignment and victory was the conquest of Kasur in 1907CE. The Maharaja, conferred to him the title of Sardar and presented him with a considerable estate, again acclaimed his bravery in this hard fought battle.Cannon mounted on camel - a warfare weapon of Hari Singh Artillary - "Shutersvaar"
It was on the 24th of February 1810, that the Maharaja, along with Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa, attacked Multan. This was a very hard battle where the Multan Fort was fortified by the Nawab of Bahawalpur, and even after considerable bombardment the walls of the fort held on. It was suggested that if some warriors could reach the fort and place dynamite near the walls and blow the wall apart, the army then could enter the fort. This was a suicidal mission, but Sardar Hari Singh was the first volunteer to jump and except the challenge. He, along with 74 others did the needful and the Sikh army entered the fort and the battle was won, but Hari Singh was very seriously wounded, and had no hope of living. But after some time he recovered, to the delight of the Maharaja and the Sikh army, who now considered him an exceptional soldier, and was duly honored by the Maharaja with more estate and money. His further conquests included Mitha Tiwana, Uch, and the historic win over the Afghanis at the Attock Fort. Later on 20th April 1819, the Sikh army under the command of Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa attacked Kashmir. A very ferocious battle was fought but eventually Kashmir became a part of the Sikh Empire. Diwan Moti Ram was given the governorship of Kashmir, but he proved a weak administrator, and was replaced by Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa on 24th August 1820. Sardar Hari Singh governed Kashmir in such an excellent manner that the Maharaja was highly pleased with him, and to reward him, the Maharaja instructed the Kashmir mint to name the currency after Hari Singh Nalwa. The "Hari Singh Rupee" can presently be seen in museums. The Maharaja needed Hari Singh for other campaigns, and as the situation of Kashmir was under control, he requisitioned Hari Singh back to Lahore, where plans were discussed to bring more territories under the Sikh Raj. While returning from Kashmir Sardar Hari Singh conquered Mangli on the way, which was another great win. He reached Lahore on 28th November 1821, and the Maharaja was extremely overjoyed to see him and learn of the triumph of Mangli. The Sikh army started their campaign with taking Mungher, Hazara and Hari Pur, which was named after Sardar Hari Singh. At the fort of Khairababad, the Sikh army under the command of Sardar Hari Singh only nuimbered 8000 and the Afghani army numbered nearly 150000. But the sheer bravery and audacity of the Sikh warriors was enough to overcome such a powerful force. Sir Alexander Barnes in his book "Barnes Travels - in Bukhara" narrates this Sikh victory as a milestone in history. On thr 16th of October 1831 Sardar Hari Singh was amongst the prominent Sardars, who along with Maharaja Ranjeet Singh met the British Governor General Lord Bentick at the historic meeting of Ropar.
Peshawar
Peshawar was an Afghani stronghold for 836 years and even after innumerable attempts by the Hindus, it could not be defeated and it was the biggest hurdle which had to be overcome for the establishment of the Sikh Raj. A letter dated 12th May 1834 from Maharaja Ranjeet Singh to Captain Wad, Political Agent Ludhiana, states:- "By the Grace of God at present auspicious moment I have been delighted by the arrival of happy news. The Barkzai Sardars destitute of foresight had arrayed at the dawn of the day with about 12000 horse and foot in hostility against my troops. "Kanwar Nau Nihal Singh took a spear in his hand and prepared to oppose them with great presence of mind in concert with Hari Singh Nalwa and Mr. Court with a discharge of artillery. At length the Barkazais repining at their timidity sought safety in flight and being dispersed on all sides. Peshawar fell in the hands of officers of my Government who extended their protection to the inhabitants of that place and their property. In the evening there was illumination in the city which was hailed both by Hindus and Mohammedans of the country as the harbinger of their deliverance from the hands of their tyrants." The victory of Peshawar is one of the greatest victories of the Sikh Raj and it was mostly due to the generalship and boldness of Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa.
Jamraud
Jamraud is near the border with Afghanistan. Hari Singh sensing this had quite a few forts build in that area, but the main Fort of Jamraud has a great significance in history, as it was here that the great General Hari Singh met his death Sardar Hari Singh was called to defend the fort, which was undermanned and was subsequently attacked by the Afghanis from Kabul. The battle was nearly lost when Hari Singh arrived and turned the tables. It was his very name, which sent shudders of panic in the spines of the assailants. It was whiles chasing the enemy into the Khyber Pass, that Sardar Hari Singh was hit by two bullets in his chest. Hari Singh, though hit badly did not give any impression of being wounded, and returned straight to the Fort, where he was taken down from his horse His wounds were tended but he did not survive and the Sikh Raj was deprived of an exceptional man of distinguished valor. Sir Lepel Griffin, in his book 'The Punjab Chiefs' writes:-
"Hari Singh was struck by two balls, one in the side and the other in the stomach. He knew he was mortally wounded, but fearing to discourage his men, he turned his horse's head, and managed to ride as far as his tent. He swooned as he was taken from his horse, and half an hour later the bravest of the Sikh Generals, the man with the terror of whose name Afghan mothers used to quiet their fretful children was dead."
Sardar Hari Singh at Jamraud
The battle Ground of Jamraud-the last stand of the great Nalwa Sardar
A rare photograph of the Jamraud Fort near the Khyber Pass
Sayyed Mohd. Lateef, in the "History of the Punjab writes;-"Such was the dread in which the Afghans held him, that to this day the name 'Haria' is repeated by mothers in Peshawar and its neighborhood in frightening their children."
The editor of the Tit Bits newspaper of England wrote in one of his columns around 1881:- "Some people might think that Napoleon was a great General. Some might name Marshall Hendenburgh, Lord Kitchener, General Karobzey or Duke of Wellington etc. And some going further might say Halaku Khan, Changez Khan, Richard or Allaudin etc. But let me tell you that in the North of India a General of the name of Hari Singh Nalwa of the Sikhs prevailed. Had he lived longer and had the sources and artillery of the British, he would have conquered most of Asia and Europe…."
No doubt - Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa was the Greatest General ever! Kadar Yaar, a Panjabi poet writes in the 'Hari Singh Nama', what Sardar Hari says to his horse, when he was hit by the bullets:-
"nUn inkl cl GoiVAw ikly dI vl, AsW pwvxw nhIN dUjI vwr Pyrw [
golI l`gI ey kihr klor vwlI, Gwiel hoieAw hY A`j svwr qyrw [
myry bWikAw CYl CbIilAw E, hYN quM sYAW mYdwnW dw Xwr myrw [
kwdr Xwr jy qUM lY clyN A`j fyry, qyrw kdy nw BulsI ipAwr Syrw [" *******************************************************************
"vw vigAw hvw dy vWg GoVw, ijvyN inkldw qIr kmwn ivcoN [
mwr cuMgIAW hrn dy vWg Xwro, auf igAw sI aus mYdwn ivcoN [
POjW isMGW dIAW ivcoN guzr igAw, lMG igAw sI lSkr pTwx ivcoN [
kwdr Xwr hT nwl srdwr bYTw, AYpr inkldI peI sI jwn ivcoN [" ********************************************************************
A very rare painting of the great Sikh Hero, Hari Singh Nalwa from the Lahore Museum (Courtesy F.Aijzzudin)
A sketch (the face fully painted) of Hari Singh Nalwa, seated on the ground and telling beads. His long white beard almost reaches his waist. He wears a compact white turban. In keeping with his martial naturehe is fully armed even during prayers.
COMMENT: The most famous and feared of Sikh generals, Hari Singh began his military career in Kasur while in his teens. His abilities were quickly recognised by MaharajaRanjit Singh who rewarded him with the governorships of Kashmir (1820). Hazara (1823), and later the control of Peshawar (1835). In 1836 Hari Singh built Jamraud Fort.
The Austrian traveller, Baron Hugel, recorded this recollection of his visit to Hari Singh's palace-fort at Guseraoli (near Wazirabad) in January 1836: "Hari Singh's manner and conversation are very frank and affable: and having acquainted myself beforehand with the history of this most distinguished member of Ranjit's court. I surprised him by my knowledge whwncw he had gained the appellation of Nalwa, and of his having cloven the head of a tiger who had already seized him as its prey. He told the Diwan to bring some drawings and gave me his portrait, in the act of killing the beast. Hari Singh Nalwa was the person sent by Ranjit to invite Lord William Bentick to confer with the Maharaja at Simla; and as I happened to know most of the persons he had met there, our conversation was very different from the majority of such interviews in India, and really consisted of a due exchange of ideas, and of references to events which had actually taken place. His questions proved him to have thought and reasoned justly; he is well informed on the statistics of many of the European States, and on the policy of the East India Company, and, what is very rare among the Sikhs, he can both read and write the Persian language (Hugel (1845), 254-255)
Hari Singh Nalwa died fighting the Pathan forces of Dost Mohammed Khan of Afghanistan. He was cremated in the Jamraud Fort & his TOMB was built by Babu Gajju Mall Kapur there
Tomb in memory of S. Hari Singh Nalwa at Gujranwala, his home town.
Hari Singh was made the Governor of Kashmir where he made the people of Kashmir his friends with his benevolent nature.
S. Hari Singh Nalwa heads into Jamraud with his victorious army
General Hari Singh Nalwa (photo courtsey The Sikhs)
S. Hari Singh Nalwa passes justice in a court ( page from a manuscript - early 20th century)
Another scene of a court with the Nalwa Sardar as the judge. (see above)
Portrait of S. Hari Singh Nalwa - from the same manuscript.
A portrait of Sardar Hari Singh by artist Devender Singh
Maharaja Ranjit Singh with his greatest General S. Hari Singh Nalwa
(photo courtesy royal asiatic society)
GENEOLOGY OF S.Hari Singh Nalwa as supplied by Ms. Vanit Nalwa a seventh generation descendant of the great Sikh General, who is living in New Delhi and is managing the Hari Singh Nalwa Trust. She is a trained neuro-psychologist and hypnotherapist . My sincere thanks to her. (Kanwal).





Sunday, September 18, 2011

Translation of Japji Sahib 5 Pauri (Meaning Gurbani Vichar in English Punjabi Guru Granth Sahib JI)



  • ਥਾਪਿਆ ਨ ਜਾਇ ਕੀਤਾ ਨ ਹੋਇ ॥
    He cannot be established, He cannot be created.
    ਉਹ ਕਿਸੇ ਦਾ ਨਾਂ ਅਸਥਾਪਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਨਾਂ ਹੀ ਬਣਾਇਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਹੈ।

    ਆਪੇ ਆਪਿ ਨਿਰੰਜਨੁ ਸੋਇ ॥
    He Himself is Immaculate and Pure.
    ਉਹ ਪਵਿਤਰ ਪੁਰਖ ਸਾਰਾ ਕੁਛ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਹੈ।

    ਜਿਨਿ ਸੇਵਿਆ ਤਿਨਿ ਪਾਇਆ ਮਾਨੁ ॥
    Those who serve Him are honored.
    ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੇ ਉਸ ਦੀ ਟਹਿਲ ਸੇਵਾ ਕਮਾਈ, ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਇਜ਼ਤ ਪਰਾਪਤ ਹੋਈ।

    ਨਾਨਕ ਗਾਵੀਐ ਗੁਣੀ ਨਿਧਾਨੁ ॥
    O Nanak, sing of the Lord, the Treasure of Excellence.
    ਹੇ ਨਾਨਕ! ਉਸ ਦੀ ਸਿਫ਼ਤ ਸ਼ਲਾਘਾ ਗਾਇਨ ਕਰ ਜੋ ਉਤਕ੍ਰਿਸ਼ਟਰਾਈਆਂ ਦਾ ਖ਼ਜ਼ਾਨਾ ਹੈ।

    ਗਾਵੀਐ ਸੁਣੀਐ ਮਨਿ ਰਖੀਐ ਭਾਉ ॥
    Sing, and listen, and let your mind be filled with love.
    ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰੀਤ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੇ ਦਿਲ ਅੰਦਰ ਟਿਕਾ ਕੇ ਉਸ ਦੀ ਕੀਰਤੀ ਗਾਇਨ ਤੇ ਸਰਵਣ ਕਰ।

    ਦੁਖੁ ਪਰਹਰਿ ਸੁਖੁ ਘਰਿ ਲੈ ਜਾਇ ॥
    Your pain shall be sent far away, and peace shall come to your home.
    ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਤੇਰੀ ਤਕਲੀਫ ਦੂਰ ਹੋ ਜਾਵੇਗੀ ਅਤੇ ਤੂੰ ਖੁਸ਼ੀ ਆਪਣੇ ਗ੍ਰਹਿ ਨੂੰ ਲੈ ਜਾਵੇਂਗਾ।

    ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਨਾਦੰ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਵੇਦੰ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਰਹਿਆ ਸਮਾਈ ॥
    The Guru’s Word is the Sound-current of the Naad; the Guru’s Word is the Wisdom of the Vedas; the Guru’s Word is all-pervading.
    ਗੁਰਬਾਣੀ ਰੱਬੀ ਕਲਾਮ ਹੈ, ਗੁਰਬਾਨੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦਾ ਗਿਆਨ ਅਤੇ ਗੁਰਬਾਣੀ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਹੀ ਸੁਆਮੀ ਨੂੰ ਸਾਰੇ ਵਿਆਪਕ ਅਨੁਭਵ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ।

    ਗੁਰੁ ਈਸਰੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਗੋਰਖੁ ਬਰਮਾ ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬਤੀ ਮਾਈ ॥
    The Guru is Shiva, the Guru is Vishnu and Brahma; the Guru is Paarvati and Lakhshmi.
    ਗੁਰੂ ਸ਼ਿਵ ਹੈ, ਗੁਰੂ ਹੀ ਵਿਸ਼ਨੂੰ ਤੇ ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾਂ, ਗੁਰੂ ਹੀ ਸ਼ਿਵ ਦੀ ਪਤਨੀ-ਪਾਰਬਤੀ, ਵਿਸ਼ਨੂੰ ਦੀ ਪਤਨੀ ਲਖਸ਼ਮੀ ਅਤੇ ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਦੀ ਪਤਨੀ-ਸੁਰਸਵਤੀ ਹੈ।

    ਜੇ ਹਉ ਜਾਣਾ ਆਖਾ ਨਾਹੀ ਕਹਣਾ ਕਥਨੁ ਨ ਜਾਈ ॥
    Even knowing God, I cannot describe Him; He cannot be described in words.
    ਭਾਵੇਂ ਮੈਂ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਨੂੰ ਜਾਣਦਾ ਹਾਂ, ਮੈਂ ਉਸ ਨੂੰ ਵਰਣਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰ ਸਕਦਾ। ਬਚਨਾ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਉਹ ਬਿਆਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾ ਸਕਦਾ।

    ਗੁਰਾ ਇਕ ਦੇਹਿ ਬੁਝਾਈ ॥
    The Guru has given me this one understanding:
    ਗੁਰੂ ਨੇ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਇਕ ਚੀਜ਼ ਸਮਝਾ ਦਿਤੀ ਹੈ।

    ਸਭਨਾ ਜੀਆ ਕਾ ਇਕੁ ਦਾਤਾ ਸੋ ਮੈ ਵਿਸਰਿ ਨ ਜਾਈ ॥੫॥
    there is only the One, the Giver of all souls. May I never forget Him! ||5||
    ਸਮੂਹ ਜੀਵਾਂ ਦਾ ਕੇਵਲ ਇਕ ਦਾਤਾਰ ਹੈ। ਉਹ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਕਦੇ ਭੀ ਨਾਂ ਭੁਲੇ।

    —————————————————————————–
    Please Note: During sending messages of GURBANI if ever we made any mistake…
    please let us know to correct it and please forgive us..

HISTORY OF MAHARAJA DALIP SINGH JI


The complex and strange life of Dalip Singh, almost theatrical in the way that it subdivides into different scenes and acts, compresses into the life of a single individual all the tensions and violence brought about the clash of two great cultures. It contains the sadness and dignity of human being trying to act decently towards each other, despite being caught up in this clash and, on one side at least, an almost complete misunderstanding of the other's position. 
Dalip Singh (1838-1893), the last Sikh ruler of the Punjab, was the youngest son of Rani Jindan, a junior queen of Ranjit Singh, and came to the throne at age of five in 1843 after a series of bloody coups and counter-coups left no other contenders. At first, the young boy catapulted on to the throne cannot have been aware of the struggles behind the scenes. The first year of his life were played out against the rich background of the court and the beautiful Mughal places of Lahore. He enjoyed falconry and had the best horses and elephants to ride. Everyday costumes and trays of jewels were brought for him to choose from. He received a royal education with two tutors, one for the Persian of the court and the other for the Gurmukhi of the Guru Granth Sahib. He was taught to shoot with the gun and bow, and trained in command by being given a troop of sixty boys. The love of his mother and her brother Jawahar Singh, who played a particularly affectionate role in the boy’s life, surrounded him.
   It must have seemed a kind of heaven to the boy, but the brutalities of the politics soon invaded. Jawahar Singh had been removing his rivals and following a pro-British line that alienated the Khalsa Army, who summoned him before them on 21 September 1845. Although accompanied by Rani Jindan and Dalip Singh, he was killed before their eyes, despite the separate pleas of his sister. The child was horror-struck and in later life often recalled his fear and shock, describing how he had been in his uncle’s arms and realized he might be next. The military history of the First Anglo-Sikh War which now broke out has often been told. The complex nature of politics at the court of Lahore is revealed by the peace settlement, under which the Khalsa army was defeated but its nominal commander Tej Singh rewarded by the British. The other major figure in the Sikh government, Gulab Singh Dogra, had negotiated the peace and was made the independent Maharaja of Kashmir. The British had won because the Sikh state was divided. By the terms of the Treaty of Byrowal in December 1846, a council of Regency (including Rani Jindan) was set up and a British resident and garrison imposed as a temporary measure until Dalip Singh came of age. At first sight the treaty seemed very generous, protecting the young Maharaja until his state could be handed over to him intact, although reduced in size. In reality the British began to dismantle the Sikh State.
Henry Lawrence, who ruled the Punjab as resident, was charmed by the boy and personally kind to him, organizing activities and magic lantern parties. However, the Maharaja’s first recorded political act enraged Lawrence. At the Annual Hindu festival Dussera in 1847 Dalip Singh publicly refused, despite British instructions, to mark Tej Singh as his commander-in-chief. Lawrence and Henry Hardinge, the governor general, were convinced, probably correctly, that Rani Jindan had put him up to it. Lawrence acted swiftly. He asked the young prince to ride with him late at night; it was impossible to refuse and when Dalip Singh asked to return to the palace, Lawrence told him that he was to spend the night in the Shalimar Gardens. The next he learnt that his mother had been seized in his absence and placed under house arrest, and that he was forbidden to have any contact with her. Both other and son were devastated, Rani writing to Lawrence:
 "Restore my son to me, I cannot bear the pain of separation - my son is very young. He is incapable of doing anything. I have left the kingdom. I have no need of a kingdom - there is no one with my son. He has no sister, no brother. He has no uncle, junior or senior. His father he has lost. To whose care has he been entrusted?"
Although it is possible to conclude that the governor-general and Henry Lawrence, as well as his successor, his brother John Lawrence took the Treaty of Byrowal seriously but it is clear that Rani Jindan felt that they had no intension of upholding it. In desperation she wrote, 'why do you take possession of the kingdom by underhand means? Why do you not do it openly? On the one hand you make a show of friendship and on the other hand you have put us in prison. Do justice to me or I shall appeal to the London Headquarters.' 
Lord Dalhousie, the governor-general who replaced Hardinge, had absolutely no time for indirect rule, and his new resident, Frederick Currie, was partially responsible for igniting the complex chain of events that led to that Second Anglo-Sikh War. While rebels claimed to be fighting in Dalip Singh's name, no evidence was ever provided to show that he had any part in the revolt. Isolated in the palace, he can have had little idea of what was going on. Nevertheless, the rebellion gave Dalhousie the legal fig-leaf he needed and, despite the fact that the British had sworn to uphold Dalip' throne against rebellion, now they disposed him and Punjab was formally annexed. The boy was sent into internal exile to a town called Fatehgarh in a care of new guardian, Dr John Login. He left behind his throne, his palaces, much of his personal fortune and his country, never to return.
Fatehgarh was a remote provincial town near Kanpur and an admired centre of Christian missionary activity in North India, with churches, orphanages, schools, a carpet factory and a village of Indian Christian converts. Dalip's extensive household was part-European and part-Indian, shared with his sister-in-law and her son. He was allowed elephants and hawks, and had a guard of honor made up of Sikhs and Skinner's Horse. Rumors were spread by Dalhousie about Dalip's mother, who had fled to Kathmandu. Dalhousie described Dalip Singh as 'a brat begotten of a bheeshtee' in his private correspondence, while at the same time writing to the young maharaja: 'Believe the strength and sincerity of the regard in which I shall ever feel towards you, and to remain, now and always Your Highness's sincere and affectionate friend'. the boy knew enough to agree with his guardian Login that it was all true and claimed that in Lahore he had thought of executing her, though an Urdu letter sent back to Lahore suggests a different story. In it, Dalip, now about fourteen, asked eagerly for information about his mother. Her personal influence was to remain very strong throughout his life, with no sign of animosity between the two.
   In Fatehgarh Dalip became a Christian. Login and his wife had taken on the role of the father and mother in boy's life and were devout Christians. Two British boys were his closet friends, and one of them was a son of missionary. The British textbooks he studied were full of Christian messages. He was an intelligent young man, with sudden burst of curiosity for all sorts of things, above all people. It would have been surprising if Dalip had not been affected- and one of his servants, Bhajan Lal, was a Brahmin convert to Christianity and read him from the Bible. The strange feature of the conversion, which was reported at length by Bhajan Lal, is that the points which seemed to have convinced Dalip Singh that Christianity was to be preferred were all connected with Hinduism. He asked former Brahmin about the Hindu Scriptures, the benefits of  bathing in the Ganges and the merits of giving cows to Brahmins. He wanted to take tea with his best British friend, Tommy Scott, which would have had momentous significance in Hindu eyes as he would thereby have lost caste. All these points involved Hinduism, not Sikhism, as he was later to point out on reconverting.
Dalip Singh's conversion may have been genuine, or maybe regarded as the result of psychological pressure, or perhaps it was a political act. However, there is no doubt that he himself forced the pace, setting up the faithful tea party with Tommy Scott and overriding the resistance of his servants and sister-in-law, and hesitation of the British. It was decisive act which changed his whole situation. Whatever his motives, he acted with customary generosity in supporting financially all the mission schools in the area. Dalhousie had earlier refused requests to allow the young prince to visit Britain, reflecting his concern about the number of Indian ex-rulers turning up in London and appealing direct to the queen or the Home Government. Dalhousie was placed at the conversion because it appeared to destroy any possible political threat from Dalip and opened up the possibility of marriage with Princess Victoria Gouramma, the recently baptized daughter of the disposed Raja of Coorg, which would have created a highly influential family of Indian Christian ex-rajas.
Thus, on 19 April 1854 Dalip Singh set sail for Britain. Dalhousie had given him a Bible inscribed 'This holy book in which he (Dalip) has been led buy God's grace to find an inheritance richer by far than all earthly kingdoms is presented with sincere respect and regarded by his faithful friend'. Dalip later referred to this note in a manner that showed its irony, in coming from the 'friend' who had cost him his earthly kingdom, had not escaped him. 
On arrival he quickly gained a royal audience and was an immediate success with Queen Victoria, who kept him close on state occasions despite opposition from some British grandees and continental diplomats. She invited her into her family circle at Osborne where she sketched him several times playing happily with her children, and Prince Albert photographed him. Bazaar incidents still surround him, however, perhaps none more so than during the painting of the Winter halter portrait. While the maharaja stood in his full costume on a plinth, a brief conversation held between the queen, Prince Albert and a nervous Mrs Login. To the latter's astonishment, at a signal a party of yeoman warders in full uniform entered the room, escorting an official carrying a box. The queen called the maharaja over and shadow him the newly recut Koh-i-nur diamond, which he took to the window to inspect. With a gesture worthy of the most polished Renaissance courtier the maharaja presented the diamond back to the queen, saying how much pleasure it gave him to be able this time to make the gift in person.
   The friendship between Queen and maharaja was sealed, and he was even able to skate over the lethal depths that the news of the Indian Mutiny of 1857 brought. He learnt to sample all the pleasures of a British gentleman. He had estates in Scotland, apparently dressing himself and his household in kilts, and also in Yorkshire; he liked shooting and photography and he traveled on the continent. In 1859 Dalip Singh returned to India in order to rescue his new ageing mother from political exile in Nepal. While he was in Calcutta he was besieged by ex-members of his court and, more dangerously, by hundred of soldiers from Sikh regiments visiting him. He could find nowhere to settle his mother, his own movements were curtailed by the government, and he was seriously worried that over-enthusiastic Sikhs would compromise him. The visit was unhappy and painful experience. 
Mother and son returned to London. The Rani made considerable attempts to adapt attempting to wear British dress, going to church, encouraging him to take British wife. And he was delighted to be reunited with her; commissioning portraits and sculptures of her hands in marble. Then in 1863 she died. She had, however, made him remember the past. Following a return to India for her cremation, the maharaja was determined not to remain alone. Finding a wife was no easy matter. He had already alarmed Lady Login by telling her of his plans to propose to one of her relations, but finally chose, by correspondence from a Cairo mission school, a part German, part Ethiopian girl who spoke only Arabic. Her name was Bamba Muller.
    He took her home to his newly acquired estate at Elveden, selected and purchased for him by the India office. He transformed the rundown estate into an efficient, modern game preserve, and the house into a semi-oriental place. With halls decorated with glass mosaic in the fashion of a Shish Mahal and dominated by the huge oil paintings of Ranjit Singh in darbar or at the Golden Temple of his brother Sher Singh in regal splendor, and with sculptures of past glories and cases of jewels, the whole place was a powerful reminder of his former status. He lived with his wife and growing family, the sons wearing a variety of costumes but frequently photographed in Sikh clothes, and with uncut hair. He invited Edward, Prince of Wales to highly successful shoots; Sikh visitors would discreetly come and go. Dalip loved Elveden and rebuilt the church, cottages and a school. At the height of his troubles the threat of his leaving the village panicked the rector into describing the effect that this would have on 'the afflicted, the aged and the extreme poor', 'for the school, clubs and charities, hitherto entirely supported by His Highness, will be supported by him no more'.
   
The new home had brought new expenses and as father of three boys and two daughters, he had to look to his future. His treaty pension was controlled by the India office and at first all he wanted was an increase, a settlement of his existing debts and to see the fund's accounts. The queen asked the India office to look into the matter favorably. The maharaja agreed to his accounts being examined to see if he had been extravagant, and all looked set for a reasonable compromise. The queen supported him, as did many of his high society friends and others but India office was flatly hostile. In 1886 the Duke of Grafton wrote to the India office, 'the truth is, they have spent the money and have no funds to fall back on and so fear an investigation'. 
Dalip Singh's grievance about the loss of his kingdom re-emerged. The stakes rose on both sides with the India office successively suggesting that he was a spendthrift and a gambler, and that he kept mistress, before running to Dalhousie's old libel that he was a bastard. In the face of the India office's determined resistance and the increasing note of the challenge by the maharaja, Queen Victoria was forced to distance herself. In 1882 the maharaja went public with a letter to 'The Times'. Almost as explosively, he began to realize how far he had been misled over the teachings of Guru Nanak as these were progressively revealed to him by his relatives. Rani Jindan had reminded him of the rumors that had circulated amongst Sikhs that her son had been mentioned in prophecies by Guru Gobind Singh, and he began to think of reconverting. Finally, in 1886, he made up his mind to return to India and place himself as the prophesied moral head of the Sikh people, revitalizing the religion and purifying it of Hindu influences, especially caste. He published a public message in the papers so that effect and set sail. 
He had stopped at Aden, where the Indian government's authority began, and was accused of issuing a disloyal proclamation. Difficulties were put in the way of his receiving Pahul, or re-initiation into Sikhism. Dalip challenged the viceroy, Lord Dufferin, to substantiate the charge of disloyalty but his government refused, being keen to keep the matter out of court. They did however allow the Pahul to go ahead and Dalip Singh once more became a Sikh. Unable to proceed to India from Aden, he sent his family back to Elveden but could not himself bear the humiliation of returning. Instead, he went to Paris and from there wrote that he would be content with his private estates in Punjab, and a seat on the Council of India. This appointment would be to enquire into a amend the petty grievance of the natives of India, which believe me are like thousands of little fires ready to be  blown into a great conflagration at any moment by th merest accident, and I shall be more than content to serve England loyally and undertake to establish Her Empire on the foundation of justice - No one (though I say it myself) knows so well as I do both the English and the Indians by the particular circumstances of my life. 
No viceroy would agree to this. In Paris Dalip Singh entered the world of intrigue. His own agent, Thakur Singh, a founder member of Singh Sabha, the major Sikh reform movement, had created a large undercover movement in the Punjab. The Patrick Casey of the Fenians contacted him - traveling on Casey's passport, Dalip went to Russia. On the way, a Berlin railway station, a British agent picked his pocket and he lost most of his money. In Russia he was supported by the leader of the anti-British party and newspaper editor Katkoff, and met Jemal al-Din al-Afghani, an agent dedicated to the pan-Islamic anti-colonial movement. The maharaja was thus at the centre of a web that included Sikhs, Irish republicans, Russian, Afghans and Egyptian agents. With them he created a master plan in which a combined Russo-Afghan force would invade India, precipitating revolts by the Sikh regiments and mutinies amongst the Irish. The surviving Sikh rajas would join them while the Bengalis sabotaged the railway system. Meanwhile, Egyptian nationalists would cut the Suez canal.
However the Russian were more interested in using Dalip as a pawn to persuade the British government to pressure anti-Tsarist dissidents in London than in grandiose geopolitical adventures. The web soon unraveled: his principal Russian backer Katkoff died, Thakur Singh too died (or was poisoned) in Pondicherry, and Dalip's secret correspondence with Indian rulers was traced. With hardly any money of his own, deserted by his Russian backers, and with his Indian organization broken, Dalip had no political influence left. In Britain Princess Bamba died, and maharaja's family was in trouble. He returned to Paris where he suffered a massive stroke. While ill, he was visited by his eldest son Prince Victor and those of his British friends who had remained faithful to him, and taken care of his children. The queen was holidaying in Nice, and it was these friends who arranged for her to have one last meeting with the maharaja. According to the queen it was a highly emotional meeting in which the obviously very sick man broke down and asked for forgiveness. He was buried at Elveden in 1893 and amongst the wreaths was one from queen Victoria and another from the Prince of Wales. 
The maharaja's loyal circle of British friends thought that his attempt to regain his throne and his reconversion to Sikhism was the result of madness. However convenient a diagnosis for them, it hardly stands up in hindsight. Thakur Singh's organization in India was quite real, and Dalip was perhaps the first Indian nationalist to attempt to reconcile the different interests of the princes, non-princely India and Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus. His attempt to build up an anti-colonial alliance showed an awareness of the need to organize internationally, but he had only come to this point after finally realizing that all other avenues were closed to him. 
Perhaps it was the Indian office which showed the greatest lapse of judgment in denying resolutely any partnership in the real government of India even to the most loyal and most anglicized Indian, and insisting, as Dalhousie once wrote, that any India, no matter how well received in London, would have to leave his slippers outside the door of the viceroy's office in India.

KARMI-NAMA & RAJ-NAMA (GURU NANAK TALKING TO QAZI RUKAN DIN AT MECCA)

  The  Karni Namah  and the  Raj Namah  are two significant chapters of the Sau Sakhi, the Sikh book of prophecy. The Raj Namah appears in, ...